The fresh modifications worried the latest elimination of the next factors: step one, dos, 4, six, thirteen, 15, 18, 20, twenty two, 23, twenty five and you will twenty-seven. Therefore, immediately following getting rid of these materials, Design 2(b) achieved max philosophy that have god- of- match indices. The latest FJS manufactured fifteen points, where the global Squared Multiple Correlations (SMC) list try .sixty, showing you to sixty% of the difference is actually said by the hidden situations. The brand new relationship anywhere between Grounds step one and you may Grounds dos is actually .66, it actually was .80 anywhere between Foundation dos and you may Basis 3, and was .75 ranging from Grounds step 1 and you will Factor step 3, indicating the partnership between your about three facts (Shape step 1). Standard weights varied from .64 (goods 24) in order to .84 (product 22).
Getting Grounds step 1, Ordinal’s alpha try .94 and McDonald’s Omega was .93. Basis 2 achieved an Ordinal alpha worth of .95 and you will McDonald’s Omega is actually .92. And Factor step 3 got a reliability value of .ninety having Ordinal’s alpha and .88 to have McDonald’s Omega.
Very first, Pearson correlations have been achieved between your FJS size and socio-demographic details. Gender was for the FJS- Factor dos (Partner vigilance), in which feminine said large ratings (M= , SD = six.15) than simply dudes (Yards = 9.94, SD = 5.94). Yet not, to handle this matter rigorously, an invariance analysis is used, leading to conformity with metric invariance with the same CFI thinking (.92) for both the low-contrast model and weighted model 1. On top of that, the essential difference between model step 1 loads and model 2 intercepts and you will limitations and you may model step 3 architectural covariance differed from the thinking lower than 0.05 (model 1 = .92; design 2 = .ninety and you will model step 3 = .90). Fortsett å lese When examining the brand new modification cost, it was listed that certain activities was in fact weak