, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you will Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you can Jalalzai, 2021). Inside performs we’re going to work with misogyny while the recognized by our interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s 6 years in fuel, specifically focusing on the relationship anywhere between misogynistic backlash and the gendered double bind character known. In the following section we offer an even more nuanced meaning having each of the subcategories recognized (pick Dining table 2), delivering sit-alone meanings and you may instances throughout the study in addition to descriptive analyses regarding key moments from inside the Rousseff’s presidency that exemplify new active anywhere between all of our nuanced proposal having viewing the latest gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, as well as impact on Rousseff’s presidency.
The fresh new five subcategories identified starred in the information and knowledge in the different accounts (get a hold of Dining tables step 3, 4). Several themes starred in large ratio: Investigations so you’re able to Dudes and you may Misogynyments themed as the investigations to dudes appeared from inside the nearly half all of the interview and you will represented 36 % from all statements codifiedments styled as the misogyny were most statements (38 percent) and starred in forty-two % of all interviews. Put another way, interviewees have been extremely cognizant of Rousseff’s character since president compared with other male political leaders and you can former presidents, together with ways Rousseff is actually punished throughout their own management due to gendered presumption and backlash.
While you are appearing that have shorter regularity in the interview, additional a couple of layouts bring crucial perspective to help you understanding you’ll sexist backlash in presidency away from Brazil’s earliest lady chairman. Talks precisely how Rousseff attempted to adhere to gendered expectations ascribed to help you feminine (Conforming for the Double Join) starred in more 10 % of remark coded and you will interview used. At the same time, dialogue on how Rousseff confronted this new gendered expectations of their reputation (Problematic the new Double Bind) starred in more than you to 5th of all the interviews, constituting 16 percent of the many statements coded.
The newest dysfunction of your numerical thickness of your thematic studies brings a starting point so you can a qualitative research of each and every motif, targeting the connection ranging from each motif, particularly the partnership between your around three themes yourself associated with the latest gendered twice join (review, complying, and you will difficult) while the misogynistic backlash one to adopted.
Analysis so you’re able to guys
One of the subcategories understood are contrasting off Dilma Rousseff in order to dudes, one another comparing Rousseff to men political leaders and you will describing how anything would-be additional if Rousseff was in fact a man. Thus, i learned that you will find each other an abstract role and you may standard component to their particular research in order to dudes. From inside the a conceptual experience, we frequently watched the term, “in the event that she was a man” to describe just how a posture could have played aside in a different way got Dilma perhaps not come a woman. The fresh new narrative depicted within our interviews try away from a system one to “prefers guys” (Respondent 88, ), which have “zero discover gender discrimination, however the simple fact that [an excellent politician] try one are a plus” (Respondent 8, ). When discussing it review a whole lot more concretely, discover a pay attention to Rousseff’s rough identity, the new “hard woman to tender men.” New quotation less than will bring significantly more context:
Talks throughout the Rousseff’s impeachment and the sexism and you can misogyny about new procedure was in fact chatted about for the well-known media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you may Kaiser, 2016) as well as in scholarly really works (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Yes, as well as said that she is actually a challenging individual, you to she couldn’t communicate with some body, one she got a keen authoritarian technique for speaking. Whatever for males appears as a go with “zero, he’s a painful people, a personal-sure person that understands exactly what the guy wishes.” So you can their are showed just like the negative “no, she will not understand how to speak, this woman is tough, she is this” within the an awful ways. How they talk to all of us, feminine. We have attained a certain reputation, we have been being harsh, we have been deviating of in order to how to be a female, who is nice, clear, silent and you will such. The type of Dilma getting ‘s the types of women who manage to become strong inside a completely patriarchal world, against which purchase that can be obtained (Respondent 79, ).