The fresh modifications worried the latest elimination of the next factors: step one, dos, 4, six, thirteen, 15, 18, 20, twenty two, 23, twenty five and you will twenty-seven. Therefore, immediately following getting rid of these materials, Design 2(b) achieved max philosophy that have god- of- match indices. The latest FJS manufactured fifteen points, where the global Squared Multiple Correlations (SMC) list try .sixty, showing you to sixty% of the difference is actually said by the hidden situations. The brand new relationship anywhere between Grounds step one and you may Grounds dos is actually .66, it actually was .80 anywhere between Foundation dos and you may Basis 3, and was .75 ranging from Grounds step 1 and you will Factor step 3, indicating the partnership between your about three facts (Shape step 1). Standard weights varied from .64 (goods 24) in order to .84 (product 22).
Getting Grounds step 1, Ordinal’s alpha try .94 and McDonald’s Omega was .93. Basis 2 achieved an Ordinal alpha worth of .95 and you will McDonald’s Omega is actually .92. And Factor step 3 got a reliability value of .ninety having Ordinal’s alpha and .88 to have McDonald’s Omega.
Very first, Pearson correlations have been achieved between your FJS size and socio-demographic details. Gender was for the FJS- Factor dos (Partner vigilance), in which feminine said large ratings (M= , SD = six.15) than simply dudes (Yards = 9.94, SD = 5.94). Yet not, to handle this matter rigorously, an invariance analysis is used, leading to conformity with metric invariance with the same CFI thinking (.92) for both the low-contrast model and weighted model 1. On top of that, the essential difference between model step 1 loads and model 2 intercepts and you will limitations and you may model step 3 architectural covariance differed from the thinking lower than 0.05 (model 1 = .92; design 2 = .ninety and you will model step 3 = .90). Fundamentally, more regular Fb play with is associated with an increased number of Fb jealousy (Dining table 5).
The results revealed that the twenty seven issues formed an excellent about three-factor structure (Spouse Interest, Companion Vigilance, and you can Partner’s Intimate and Sexual relationships) hence the new alpha won’t boost if any item try removed
Secondly, the brand new connectivity ranging from FJS dimensions and proportions of RPCS, self-regard, and you may personal jealousy was basically checked. The results obtained showed that both RPCS-Partnership and RPCS-Prevention had been negatively of the around three FJS activities. In the end, self-respect and you will close envy synchronised seriously into about three FJS issues (Table 5). Furthermore, a linear regression data is presented to raised see this new predictive worth of the three FJS situations toward RPCS total get, self-respect, and you may close jealousy. While the shown within the Dining table six, the RPCS overall rating was most useful predicted from the Factor dos, i.e., mate vigilance, and you will self-admiration try greatest predict because of the Basis 3, lover’s close and you can sexual relationships, while intimate envy is actually forecast by the every around three FJS affairs.
Facebook is considered the most commonly used social network into the Colombia (Statcounter, 2020), and also as there are not any questionnaires offered to evaluate the jealousy out kissbrides.com find more of Twitter, a portion of the purpose of this research would be to adapt and examine the FJS having an example away from Colombian men and women. The conclusions presented that small kind of the newest FJS in the good Colombian shot is credible and you will good.
Decades coordinated adversely with three FJS issues, people employed in prolonged dating stated down FJS-Grounds step 1 results (lover hobby), whenever you are zero significant correlations was shown anywhere between relationships years and you will FJS Affairs dos and you can step three
Regarding the grounds framework, toward one hand, the dwelling of your size is checked when you look at the an EFA. However, these types of performance don’t correspond that have previous degree, where construction is unifactorial (Demirtas-Madran, 2016; Muise et al., 2009). Yet not, regarding Pakistani type of your FJS, this new foundation construction contains around three affairs, named of the article writers below: Insecurity, Inquisitiveness, and you can Cheating (Iqbal & Jami, 2017). Also, by means of new CFA, the main one-grounds model advised on modern type (Muise ainsi que al., 2009), which had been ratified regarding the Turkish type (Demirtas-Madran, 2016) is tested. Although not, goodness-of-match assessment failed to tell you a sufficient complement. Ergo, the latest multifactorial model extracted from the EFA is actually checked, although model wasn’t located getting sufficient goodness off complement indices.